This is the tweet I retweeted.https://twitter.com/sjzara/status/825609433694756864 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I addressed the 'rights' part of that. Humanism is neither here nor there in the argument.
@Zacnaloen@sjzara2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Its an argument about what is humanist! By an Englishman. US laws cannot refute it!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
There is nothing to refute. US law is a legal framework. Humanism is not.
@Zacnaloen@sjzara1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndyMeanie @Zacnaloen
So maybe US law doesn't apply to English people talking about what is humanist?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @AndyMeanie
If someone speaks about defending certain rights due to certain principles, they're not claiming every country grants the rights
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I haven't said anything about humanism, other than it isn't an argument as to legality.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndyMeanie
Well, then you're not in any way addressing the point which was about humanism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I like talking to you, Andy, but we've just been at cross-purposes from the start here.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.