His intention & the reason many ppl voted for him was in relation to Muslim immigration. This fails.
Its an argument about what is humanist! By an Englishman. US laws cannot refute it!
-
-
There is nothing to refute. US law is a legal framework. Humanism is not.
@Zacnaloen@sjzara -
So maybe US law doesn't apply to English people talking about what is humanist?
-
In the same way, if you said 'Defending animals rights to life is ethical' wldn't be refuted by UK butchery laws
-
I don't know how to put it any more clearly. This is the point.https://twitter.com/sjzara/status/825609433694756864 …
-
'I support X rights because Y principle' isn't countered by 'But these rights are not enshrined in my country's law
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.