Its a temp ban from locations identified by DHS as high risk while they change the rules to catch terrorists etc
If this overrules the other stuff about not discriminating by religion, obv it wld be constitutional.
-
-
So the US can restrict travel, as a way to reduce security risks, with accusations discrimination?
-
So the US can restrict travel, as a way to reduce security risks, without accusations of discrimination?
-
Why can they? What do you mean?
-
Steps may reduce a security threats. Not unknown to restrict travel for health, fraud or security risks
-
You don't say. Talking abt what is & isn't constitutional.
-
Exec Orders are vetted by legal, Homeland Sec & State Dept. Have to assume it passed constitutional test
-
You've missed half the conversation which was abt whether denying by religion is constitutional. Not this EO
-
But that was also already not the point. Got sidetracked by crossed-wires. Sick of topic now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.