His intention & the reason many ppl voted for him was in relation to Muslim immigration. This fails.
I don't know. I've been going on what people who understand the constitution have been writing.
-
-
If this overrules the other stuff about not discriminating by religion, obv it wld be constitutional.
-
So the US can restrict travel, as a way to reduce security risks, with accusations discrimination?
-
So the US can restrict travel, as a way to reduce security risks, without accusations of discrimination?
-
Why can they? What do you mean?
-
Steps may reduce a security threats. Not unknown to restrict travel for health, fraud or security risks
-
You don't say. Talking abt what is & isn't constitutional.
-
Exec Orders are vetted by legal, Homeland Sec & State Dept. Have to assume it passed constitutional test
-
You've missed half the conversation which was abt whether denying by religion is constitutional. Not this EO
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.