He promised to stop Muslim immigration until 'we figure out what's going on.;
I thought that had been established. Is it now claimed this indicates it is constitutional to discriminate by relig?
-
-
Non-citizens don't get constitutional protections and never have so why would it apply to them in the first place?
-
-
As I said, until tested in court it's all opinion.
-
Obv, it will need to be argued out by constitutional lawyers but Trump's backtrack matches current consensus.
-
FTR Option 4 is in my opinion probably the best balance of options and Trump failed on thishttps://twitter.com/markhumphrys/status/825324673902714880 …
-
I'd go somewhere between 3 & 4 as publicly opposing Islamism wld get a Pakistani atheist friend of mine killed.
-
Well, publically a bad idea. do it in in private in the interview and explain that would get you killed otherwise
-
Easily done. I'm sure jihadists would do this.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.