That's fine then! Not only is it blanket discrimination, it doesnt even do what Trump claimed!
Yes, exactly. So 'its reasonable to hold these views cos humanist' is not countered by US immigration rules.
-
-
You are also suggesting he legally can't. In fact, legal code I just tweeted gives wide leeway "Any Class of Alien"
-
I thought that had been established. Is it now claimed this indicates it is constitutional to discriminate by relig?
-
Non-citizens don't get constitutional protections and never have so why would it apply to them in the first place?
-
-
As I said, until tested in court it's all opinion.
-
Obv, it will need to be argued out by constitutional lawyers but Trump's backtrack matches current consensus.
-
FTR Option 4 is in my opinion probably the best balance of options and Trump failed on thishttps://twitter.com/markhumphrys/status/825324673902714880 …
-
I'd go somewhere between 3 & 4 as publicly opposing Islamism wld get a Pakistani atheist friend of mine killed.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.