But the rules aren't that no-one has the right to immigrate.
-
-
I wish I'd favourited the tweet of the rules that shows when it comes to immigration Trump can do whatever he wants
-
We've already come far from the point about what is humanist. Clearly, this is not synonymous with what Trump is.
-
Well, Obama did exactly the same thing in 2011. There is precedent.
@Zacnaloen -
Are we arguing whether there is precedent or whether this is humanist?
-
Not sure where 'humanist' comes into the equation. This is a question of legality.
-
This is the tweet I retweeted.https://twitter.com/sjzara/status/825609433694756864 …
-
I addressed the 'rights' part of that. Humanism is neither here nor there in the argument.
@Zacnaloen@sjzara -
Its an argument about what is humanist! By an Englishman. US laws cannot refute it!
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Constitutionally? Do explain?
@Zacnaloen -
Banning ppl by religion? Is that not unconstitutional?
-
It is not by religion. Have you even read the EO?
@Zacnaloen -
I'm talking abt his claims & intentions! He's had to change it coz not constitutional!
-
So it is constitutional to ban ppl by religion?
-
I can find any other way to interpret that legal code. "Any class of Alien"
-
I don't know. I've been going on what people who understand the constitution have been writing.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Meanwhile, his supporters continue to tell me he's stopping the islamisation of the US whilst Europe sinks under it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.