It may seem like proof of sympathy for Nazis if a liberal time-line has more tweets opposing punching them in face than condemning them. No.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
The difference is that absolutely every fellow liberal already knows Nazism is abhorrent. Worryingly, this not the case with face punching
4 replies 2 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Critics are saying that speaking back to Nazis doesn't work. It does. It has. 'Nazi' is now used to describe any authoritarian nastiness.
2 replies 4 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
From grammar to feminism. It no longer means 'adherent of Hitler's ideas' but 'thoroughly irredeemable bad person who oppresses others.'
3 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
There are 'laws' & memes & fallacies devoted to this common knowledge that Nazism is the worst thing ever. We've won this battle of ideas.
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Neo-Nazism still exists & still needs opposing but there is very little general doubt abt this. Meanwhile rising antisemitism sneaks by us.
2 replies 2 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Marxists & communists fighting nazis is nothing new, what I can get my head round is why communists still get a free pass
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Zacnaloen
Communism doesn't advocate exterminating ppl in theory. It's in practice that it does that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
you'd think we have sufficient experimental evidence by now
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yeah but if people are advocating sharing the wealth in warm fuzzy terms, this often unrealistic rather than genocidal.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.