I've said this before but I think the 'First Lady' role is outdated & bizarre. Which is odd coming from someone with a monarchy, I know.
You're missing the point. I'm asking why this is necessary. Why the president is not enough. Why does spouse have to be involved
-
-
Not how easy it is to make sure you marry a person suitable for the job of FLOTUS but why you'd have to & what if you didn't?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The wives could appeal to different voter demographics. Nancy's 'Just say No!' campaign played well in trad democratic circles
-
If the country needs to be run by a couple, this shld be codified then. I'm not sure it does.
-
US voters need to decide. I find their system (& funds involved) quite perplexing. Media image seems to overshadow substance.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Voter appeal. Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, Laura Bush & Michelle Obama enhanced the Presidents appeal. Hilary was the exception
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.