LOL
But he wrote this, so his conscience is clear:
https://twitter.com/natesparks130/status/822930691423948800 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @BristolBen
Ha! Another case of cognitive dissonance
@HPluckrose You see it everywhere.@NateSparks1301 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TamaraBrouwer1 @BristolBen and
Everytime I talk to people you all debate, this happens
There must be a connection
pic.twitter.com/QWECcgfGMx
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes. Here I must disclose that I am on level 3 of the A+ blockbot.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @TamaraBrouwer1 and
It's an SJW blockbot. I'm not so often blocked by individuals though.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @TamaraBrouwer1 and
Given this info, if you unfollow I'll understand
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @TamaraBrouwer1
I took exception to you being on the blockbot but you weren't receptive to me protesting about it! >:-[
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @TamaraBrouwer1
I can barely admit to it in polite company, but I was a little chuffed and proud to be on the bot.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen @TamaraBrouwer1
Tut. I do not support you with this. Calling you sexist or harassing is simply not on.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @TamaraBrouwer1
Of course I was a sexist harrasser. I disagreed with them!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @TamaraBrouwer1
You think it was unfair, but for me it meant I could compete with others despite my debilitating politeness

1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

