thank you for clarifying. Maybe read over whole convo if you can, might help clarify why I used it in this instance.
-
-
Replying to @NateSparks130 @HPluckrose
but I tend to address the words and validity of an argument, not how it's tone. For instance...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateSparks130 @HPluckrose
is the premise logically flawed. Is the argument based in factual error. Is the entire point to promote injury to others.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateSparks130 @HPluckrose
he was telling me my approach sucks because he doesn't believe in white male privilege.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateSparks130
Reasonable convos can be had abt this & evidence given of privilege on both sides.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
of course. I've had those convos. This particular one wasn't one of them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateSparks130 @HPluckrose
I've helped plenty of people worth honest questions understand privilege. Had civil convos with benefit.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateSparks130
But are you also open to being wrong or unbalanced in your opinions?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
the original thread was about men admitting bias and listening to women instead of pretending to be experts.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateSparks130
Helen Pluckrose Retweeted Helen Pluckrose
I get this a lot.https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/782576626123104256 …
Helen Pluckrose added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I have to go. Got company. Will check in later.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.