because I didn't spew vitriol, I didn't swear, I pointed out logical and factual flaws in someone's argument.
-
-
Replying to @NateSparks130
Helen Pluckrose Retweeted Helen Pluckrose
I am not accusing you of doing any of those things. I am asking this:https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/823182546339041280 …
Helen Pluckrose added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
thank you for clarifying. Maybe read over whole convo if you can, might help clarify why I used it in this instance.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateSparks130 @HPluckrose
but I tend to address the words and validity of an argument, not how it's tone. For instance...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateSparks130 @HPluckrose
is the premise logically flawed. Is the argument based in factual error. Is the entire point to promote injury to others.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateSparks130 @HPluckrose
he was telling me my approach sucks because he doesn't believe in white male privilege.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateSparks130 @HPluckrose
and because women in the US don't have it as bad as in the middle east. He even attempted to say that...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateSparks130 @HPluckrose
oppression can have societal benefit, made an argument from utility for slavery and patriarchy.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateSparks130
That is best responded to with reason than emotion tho, don't you think?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
perhaps read the convo. Plenty of rational response. Emotion is the opposite of reason.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I'm not judging you on your convo but talking abt a general communication prob we're having right now
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.