Thanks for the tone policing. https://twitter.com/nanobugLP/status/823048919366139904 …
-
-
thank you for clarifying. Maybe read over whole convo if you can, might help clarify why I used it in this instance.
-
but I tend to address the words and validity of an argument, not how it's tone. For instance...
-
is the premise logically flawed. Is the argument based in factual error. Is the entire point to promote injury to others.
-
he was telling me my approach sucks because he doesn't believe in white male privilege.
-
and because women in the US don't have it as bad as in the middle east. He even attempted to say that...
-
oppression can have societal benefit, made an argument from utility for slavery and patriarchy.
-
in other words, I don't cater to arguments not in good faith. A good faith disagreement is a different thing.
-
and there is always room for discussion on the effectiveness of rhetoric. These are important discussions.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.