No problem with that. It's a free country. I'm just expressing my opinion 
-
-
I've said 'That's not music. It's noise' abt techno stuff & claimed music defined by melody.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Music is recognisable the world over, even when we don't like the sound of it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
That's different objective criteria to 'requires melody'. Neither is relevant to ppl enjoying it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Enjoying it is irrelevant. It just need to be recognisable as music (not a recording of ->
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
a waterfall or babies crying) to be art.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, that's the point. Art is an experience. Fitting objective criteria less relevant.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's a *specific* kind of experience. If we allow any experience to be art, then the word->
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's an object made to produce an aesthetic response. No way to tell ppl it;s not art.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm not denying ppl the right to produce or enjoy whatever they want.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I do get that. But I can't help but feel you're missing the point of art
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.