Ppl will continue to make it, enjoy it, display it, discuss it, analyse it etc.
-
-
No problem with that. It's a free country. I'm just expressing my opinion
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I've said 'That's not music. It's noise' abt techno stuff & claimed music defined by melody.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Music is recognisable the world over, even when we don't like the sound of it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
That's different objective criteria to 'requires melody'. Neither is relevant to ppl enjoying it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Enjoying it is irrelevant. It just need to be recognisable as music (not a recording of ->
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
a waterfall or babies crying) to be art.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, that's the point. Art is an experience. Fitting objective criteria less relevant.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's a *specific* kind of experience. If we allow any experience to be art, then the word->
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
That's not the suggestion. This is getting boring now. See Wilde again. Essence of art.
-
-
Ok, hadn't read that yet. I was just making sure my point was clear.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.