This is an objective criteria, at least relative to humans. I suspect it could be expanded->
No, that's the point. Art is an experience. Fitting objective criteria less relevant.
-
-
It's a *specific* kind of experience. If we allow any experience to be art, then the word->
-
It's an object made to produce an aesthetic response. No way to tell ppl it;s not art.
-
I'm not denying ppl the right to produce or enjoy whatever they want.
-
I'm just making a philosophical argument that (I hope) might clarify semantics.
-
I don't think it does. It just clarifies your understanding of art which I feel misses point.
-
I wasn't discussing the point (purpose) of art at all, only its definition ->
-
But I think it is defined by its purpose. Can we leave it here?
-
See what your decisiveness has caused
@christianjbdev ? Hours of debating art.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
