or, in other words, it should not be dependent on a meta-narrative (a PoMo favourite).
-
-
But they'd say that the meta-narrative is your one abt what does & doesn't constitute art.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Mine is universal. If a completely alien (human) civilisation discovered a Monet painting ->
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
in a cave somewhere, they'd recognise it as art. Thus, according to me, it is art.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
OK. Obviously, the art world disagrees.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
There is only one way to decide this. Let's split into camps. I'm with
@BristolBen...@TamaraBrouwer1@christianjbdev1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SlagOffTwits @BristolBen and
Lol. I'm with you too mostly. I don't like it. Other people do.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @SlagOffTwits and
I actually like *some* PoMo "art". It's design concept, not art though IMO
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen @SlagOffTwits and
That's fine as long as you accept your opinion doesn't change the reality.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @SlagOffTwits and
Of course! These things exist and if some people like them, great!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
And they're not suddenly going to start defining art as 'universally recognised'
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.