But they'd say that the meta-narrative is your one abt what does & doesn't constitute art.
-
-
Mine is universal. If a completely alien (human) civilisation discovered a Monet painting ->
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
in a cave somewhere, they'd recognise it as art. Thus, according to me, it is art.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
This is an objective criteria, at least relative to humans. I suspect it could be expanded->
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
to extra-terrestrials too but that a larger debate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Also, not sure it's relevant. Postmodern art is what it is. Regardless of objective criteria.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen and
Ppl will continue to make it, enjoy it, display it, discuss it, analyse it etc.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen and
Not as if u can say 'but its not objectively clear its art w/out context' & that will go away
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen and
Art doesn't really reduce to objective criteria. Its about what inspires & moves people
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I disagree. Many things move me (TED talks, documentaries...) that I wouldn't call art.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Other things as well as art can move ppl, yes. Doesn't change the point.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.