My point: a piece of art should be able to exist a such independently of context.
I've said 'That's not music. It's noise' abt techno stuff & claimed music defined by melody.
-
-
Music is recognisable the world over, even when we don't like the sound of it.
-
That's different objective criteria to 'requires melody'. Neither is relevant to ppl enjoying it
-
Enjoying it is irrelevant. It just need to be recognisable as music (not a recording of ->
-
a waterfall or babies crying) to be art.
-
No, that's the point. Art is an experience. Fitting objective criteria less relevant.
-
It's a *specific* kind of experience. If we allow any experience to be art, then the word->
-
It's an object made to produce an aesthetic response. No way to tell ppl it;s not art.
-
I'm not denying ppl the right to produce or enjoy whatever they want.
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's not tho. It's defined by culture &the music world.I just mean its not what I like abt music
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
