and found this bed in someone's garage, it's just be a bed with garbage on it.
-
-
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
My point: a piece of art should be able to exist a such independently of context.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
or, in other words, it should not be dependent on a meta-narrative (a PoMo favourite).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
But they'd say that the meta-narrative is your one abt what does & doesn't constitute art.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Mine is universal. If a completely alien (human) civilisation discovered a Monet painting ->
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
in a cave somewhere, they'd recognise it as art. Thus, according to me, it is art.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
This is an objective criteria, at least relative to humans. I suspect it could be expanded->
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
to extra-terrestrials too but that a larger debate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Also, not sure it's relevant. Postmodern art is what it is. Regardless of objective criteria.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes. I'm just arguing that it should not be considered art, not that it should not exist.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
By your definition involving objective criteria. But this isn't generally how art works.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.