Yes because influential people have decided that it's art. If they all suffered from amnesia->
Ppl will continue to make it, enjoy it, display it, discuss it, analyse it etc.
-
-
No problem with that. It's a free country. I'm just expressing my opinion

-
I've said 'That's not music. It's noise' abt techno stuff & claimed music defined by melody.
-
Music is recognisable the world over, even when we don't like the sound of it.
-
That's different objective criteria to 'requires melody'. Neither is relevant to ppl enjoying it
-
Enjoying it is irrelevant. It just need to be recognisable as music (not a recording of ->
-
a waterfall or babies crying) to be art.
-
No, that's the point. Art is an experience. Fitting objective criteria less relevant.
-
It's a *specific* kind of experience. If we allow any experience to be art, then the word->
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not as if u can say 'but its not objectively clear its art w/out context' & that will go away
-
Art doesn't really reduce to objective criteria. Its about what inspires & moves people
-
Reminds me of this Oscar Wilde quote.
@BristolBen@TamaraBrouwer1pic.twitter.com/uCRWnYPENw
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.