It's recognised by being platformed & talked about. Bought & sold. Always the case.
Also, not sure it's relevant. Postmodern art is what it is. Regardless of objective criteria.
-
-
Ppl will continue to make it, enjoy it, display it, discuss it, analyse it etc.
-
No problem with that. It's a free country. I'm just expressing my opinion

-
I've said 'That's not music. It's noise' abt techno stuff & claimed music defined by melody.
-
Music is recognisable the world over, even when we don't like the sound of it.
-
That's different objective criteria to 'requires melody'. Neither is relevant to ppl enjoying it
-
Enjoying it is irrelevant. It just need to be recognisable as music (not a recording of ->
-
a waterfall or babies crying) to be art.
-
No, that's the point. Art is an experience. Fitting objective criteria less relevant.
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes. I'm just arguing that it should not be considered art, not that it should not exist.
-
By your definition involving objective criteria. But this isn't generally how art works.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.