I can understand that it might take some knowledge to really appreciate an artform but ->
-
-
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
for me, when art is not even recognisable as such without someone telling you it is ->
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
It's recognised by being platformed & talked about. Bought & sold. Always the case.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes because influential people have decided that it's art. If they all suffered from amnesia->
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
and found this bed in someone's garage, it's just be a bed with garbage on it.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
My point: a piece of art should be able to exist a such independently of context.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
or, in other words, it should not be dependent on a meta-narrative (a PoMo favourite).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
But they'd say that the meta-narrative is your one abt what does & doesn't constitute art.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen and
But we can say 'this shld not exist'. It still did. It was still meaningful to people.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen and
Not a majority of people. Other art continued. I think postmodernist had to happen and pass.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Break down all meaning. But this can't stand. Then have to rebuild.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.