But that couldn't last forever. Must have some order so then shifts towards reversals of norms.
But they'd say that the meta-narrative is your one abt what does & doesn't constitute art.
-
-
But we can say 'this shld not exist'. It still did. It was still meaningful to people.
-
Not a majority of people. Other art continued. I think postmodernist had to happen and pass.
-
Break down all meaning. But this can't stand. Then have to rebuild.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Mine is universal. If a completely alien (human) civilisation discovered a Monet painting ->
-
in a cave somewhere, they'd recognise it as art. Thus, according to me, it is art.
-
This is an objective criteria, at least relative to humans. I suspect it could be expanded->
-
to extra-terrestrials too but that a larger debate.
-
Also, not sure it's relevant. Postmodern art is what it is. Regardless of objective criteria.
-
Ppl will continue to make it, enjoy it, display it, discuss it, analyse it etc.
-
No problem with that. It's a free country. I'm just expressing my opinion

-
I've said 'That's not music. It's noise' abt techno stuff & claimed music defined by melody.
- 19 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
