Depends in what sense you mean. There are elements of form. Take them as far as you want.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @TamaraBrouwer1 and
It's a reaction to modernism, which was a reaction to realism so primary feature is re structure
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @TamaraBrouwer1 and
Literally post-structuralism. Structures of society & of form. High postmodernism is chaos...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @TamaraBrouwer1 and
But that couldn't last forever. Must have some order so then shifts towards reversals of norms.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I'm all for exploring new things but when a neophyte call even distinguish the "art" from ->
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
his bedroom on a Sunday morning, we need to rethink a bit
pic.twitter.com/bkRXDlu4mr
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
I can understand that it might take some knowledge to really appreciate an artform but ->
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose and
for me, when art is not even recognisable as such without someone telling you it is ->
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
It's recognised by being platformed & talked about. Bought & sold. Always the case.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Okay. Is that the definition of art? I suggest calling a pig a cow, does not make it so.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No. We don't define livestock this way. We do define art by what humans are making, liking etc
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @TamaraBrouwer1 and
You can say you don't like it. Meanwhile, a whole industry & intellectual movement going on.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.