I'm afraid I am again in agreement with Christian here. Sod narrowly defining art.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @TamaraBrouwer1 and
Postmodernism as an aesthetic & intellectual movement in the arts happened.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
That may be so, but it has no boundries. To the point were we call everything art.
@christianjbdev@BristolBen@IonaItalia3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TamaraBrouwer1 @HPluckrose
I find this the same as starting to call homeotherapy science Some boundries are needed
@christianjbdev@BristolBen@IonaItalia1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TamaraBrouwer1 @christianjbdev and
And they're there. Ppl track the rise & fall of it. What was & wasn't postmodern.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I'm happy to read about that. I've seen many people argue that boundaries go against
@christianjbdev@BristolBen@IonaItalia2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Depends in what sense you mean. There are elements of form. Take them as far as you want.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @TamaraBrouwer1 and
It's a reaction to modernism, which was a reaction to realism so primary feature is re structure
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
I get the reaction movement. I don't mind the exploration. I encourage testing the norms. But not
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TamaraBrouwer1 @HPluckrose and
for the sake of it. Herein lies my dislike for it. I think. Reality has value. (At least for me)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I also prefer realist forms.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.