Ppl seem to think that if they coin a phrase & say it negative, they no longer have any responsibility to justify any specif act being so.
-
-
-
"You're doing
#NotAllMen." "You're whitesplaining." "You're tone policing." "You're concern trolling." Not good enough. -
Tell me why I shouldn't object to generalisation, explain things whilst being low-melanin, urge civility or be concerned abt an issue.
-
And the same problem comes from the anti-SJW lot. They have their own meaningless condemnations. You're triggered! Do you need a safe space?
-
In fact, no. I'm disagreeing with you & saying why. Do you have a response? That's not putting 'muh' in front of whatever I said?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But spelling generalization with an S is not! :p
-
It has an 's' in it, not a 'z'!. Next you'll be telling me it's 'aluminum' and not 'aluminium'.
-
Before long, I'll be spreading heresy like that there's no U in color.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
would be important in that context to say
#notallkeiths, to protect the three million innocent Keiths from negative assumptions! -
Its nearly always necessary. Even when the group is one you've chosen but particularly when it isn't.
-
agreed!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I can see why
#notall is sometimes v necessary. Imagine if, tomorrow, one million people called Keith each murdered someone. ItThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's like everything. People mock
#NotAll when it contradicts their politics but use it when it supports them.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.