You're not. Others are. There is no consensus.
-
-
Replying to @pogsurf
I'm not claiming a consensus on whether or not solipsism is interesting.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @pogsurf
But we have strayed very far from the point and its getting late. My point is that scepticism is about epistemology -
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @pogsurf
A way of thinking abt knowledge & ways to obtain it that focuses on evidence, probability & provisional acceptance of hypotheses.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @pogsurf
In contrast to a way that focuses on belief without evidence, on faith & subjective truth which does not require evidence.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @pogsurf
To function, we all need to rely on evidence a great deal. Even the most postmodern postmodernist will check they've been paid.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @pogsurf
Even the most devout defender of religious faith will want evidence that their child has done her homework.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @pogsurf
A sceptic is someone who tries to think consistently in terms of evidence & probability & provisional hypotheses & usually does.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
But do they believe in nonsense? Unless they have tested every single belief they hold they may well do.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pogsurf
This is what I keep trying to explain. A sceptic will not believe in things. They will think in probabilities. They could misjudge
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Its a different way of thinking. You can't believe in nonsense but you can be wrong.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.