No I'm talking about the difference between what you might choose to prioritise and what someone else might.
There's a consensus. Only certain claims become significant. I doubt that you seriously think every shopping trip must be proved.
-
-
You'd only think this in relation to something else that was significant. And I'd understand why you required evidence to accept it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Context is vital here. If you wanted to prove someone's a shoplifter then maybe you do have to prove every shopping trip.
-
Yes, exactly. In cases of suspicion of crimes, we require evidence.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.