Aren't you now agreeing with me that scepticism about everything is a tall order? You disagreed then.
If they believe in things without evidence, they are not a sceptic. Whether they prioritise them or not.
-
-
If a sceptic does not choose to investigate something enough to have a position on it, they don't have a position on it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No I'm talking about the difference between what you might choose to prioritise and what someone else might.
-
I'm not sure how priorities are relevant to the mindset with which you approach things.Whether ur epistemology is faith or evidence
-
If I am a sceptic who focuses on supernatural claims and someone is a sceptic who focuses on pseudoscience, we are both sceptics.
-
Provided we don't use faith as an epistemology in relation to the other things.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.