No. Because I define 'sceptic' as 'one who doesn't believe any kind of nonsense.' Not going on self-definitions. https://twitter.com/pogsurf/status/821054607455559680 …
I did that. Now I think things are probable,improbable or don't know how probable. I don't have a mindset that 'believes in' things
-
-
I might not be explaining very well. I don't mean I can't be wrong. I can be mistaken. I mean that I approach things differently.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think I'm getting your point. Fixed views would indicate not likely to be a sceptic.
-
We can't be absolutely sure abt anything. But eg evolution is pretty secure (if we assume that reality is not an illusion)
-
No, I've already claimed "something exists". I cannot see any possible way to refute that.
-
Cogito ergo sum? Yes, unless our whole understanding of 'something' is flawed.
-
Slightly different to Descarte's claim. I don't claim there must be an "I" thinking.
-
But is it via yourself that you make the claim that something exists?
-
The self could be an illusion. But there is definitely something there.
-
But you can only say this because you perceive it.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.