You're too vague. Can't have a discussion if you won't say what you mean. Gods might exist. No good reason to think so.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @ZeroIssueVoter
That's my position. I don't know what you call it. But not endlessly arguing whether or not good exists. Moved on.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ZeroIssueVoter
*God. You seem to have a problem with 'atheism' but can't say what atheism is. James also has a problem with it but does.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I stated something. If you don't understand it, ask me to clarify. Don't throw a fit. My definition of atheism is standard.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ZeroIssueVoter
What is it? You said it involves anger, closed-mindedness and is more than ontology. Can u not just spell it out? Am I one?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
really don't get what you're having a tantrum about. What are you desperate to have spelled out?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ZeroIssueVoter
Really don't get why you perceive questions as tantrums. You've now spelled out ur talking abt ppl who claim to know no gods
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
this isn't new, I said it before. And this wasn't even my point. You were just badgering for it. So there you go.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ZeroIssueVoter
I completely missed the first tweet when you said you meant ppl who claim to know gods not to exist! Where is it?!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
it's the standard definition. If it ain't broke don't fix it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It's not tho. There are numerous but most go with 'disbelief in god'
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.