Are you just referring to our evolved tendency to see patterns & agency where they don't exist then.Not established deities?
Why? Seems very unlikely. I think he understands he doesn't believe in gods. Write a review of it if u can't explain here.
-
-
I'll consider a full on review if he engages with me more. He's gone into hiding though.
-
Write a thoughtful review & he'll respond. You've not really been saying anything. Doesn't seem you've read it or get it.
-
his work isn't important enough to justify my review
-
Ha! What a complete waste of time talking then. You've not addressed anything he says. Just sniped.Prob coz ur pro-religion
-
just being honest. The really substantive work is in psychology, anthropology, cog sci. Lindsay wouldn't fly in that arena.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
either way, I've covered some of the mistakes with him. A couple here too. Most important mistake: assumes post theism is good.
-
That's somewhat arrogant. Why not make an argument in writing for post-theism being bad? Ppl can compare your arguments.
-
what's arrogant about it? Religion is described in broadly neutral, sometimes even positive terms in the sciences.
-
his view is a departure from the science. He just takes it on faith and chugs along without realizing it.
-
Nope. Sorry. You've had plenty of chances to address the actual ideas & respond to them thoughtfully & honestly. Goodbye.
-
lol. Sorry to hear how personally committed you are to these beliefs. If/when you start questioning, you know where to find me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.