they helped trump get elected.
-
-
-
No, they didn't. The far-left did with identity politics and denial of the problem of Islamism.
-
Dawkins claims to be part of the left and undermined the filter system Christianity had created in the GOP.
-
Yes, left. Not the left ignoring the problems worrying everyone. Don't know what christian filters are.
-
an obvious non-christian never got through the modern republican primary before. Thanks Dawkins.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because for someone who prides himself on his reason, I found his reasoning severely lacking WRT Trump.
-
(speaking as a far left loon BTW) My takeaway was that Harris really dislikes Trump's personality, which isn't a good argument.
-
I think it is his personality which worries many. A president needs to focus, listen, understand, keep temper, speak coherently
-
I understand not liking the personality type, I'm not a huge fan of macho bravado myself. What I don't get is how you go from...
-
... there to "He's unqualified to be president". To me that seems more of an emotional argument than a rational one.
-
I don't get that at all. A president can't be an incoherent, impulsive child.
-
Well apparently he can be. ^^ But seriously though, I think Sam overestimates just how stupid&irresponsible Trump is due to...
-
.. his dislike for vacuous chest-thumping. Trump has been a businessman for decades, if he were a complete basket case I would..
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The way they view you, changes with every action you take. Defend something they agree with? They'll love you.
-
Object to another thing that they agree with next? You're a traitor/libtard. There seems to be no big picture. Just a hive mind
-
.
@TamaraBrouwer1 Definite tribal thing going on. They oppose the far-left loons so must be a far-right loon. Can't be a non-loon. -
Yes. My experience is that they get confused when you occasionaly agree with them. They can't place you. Which usualy is a
-
reasuring sign for me
means I'm still the same -
Interesting to note that they tone down a lot in a 1 on 1 conversation. Far left... Not so much.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't understand why far-right ppl would follow/admire Dawkins. Don't they read what he writes?
-
probably thought he was talking about social Darwinism
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.