@GSpellchecker would it? In my experience "ignoring" bullies just lets a problem grow until it can't be ignored due to tragedy
You're not making sense. You said that Breitbart got MORE popular & more powerful. That's the opposite of ignoring.
-
-
Do you see how responding to you encouraged you to go on & on being silly? I'll now ignore you & you'll soon get bored.
-
this has become my new policy. Ask a simple question with a simple answer. If they don't, discourse over.
-
Yes. Learning when to cut loose and refuse to engage at all is a balancing act I'm still working out
@HPluckrose -
But GS, you're so good at engaging it's always such a pleasure to follow! (NOT telling your want to do!)
-
Thank you!
@B_Y_3@HPluckrose -
Ditto from me too. Your skill in 140c is not only educational 4 me, but also entertaining.
@sisboombahbah@B_Y_3@HPluckrose
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
there are two audiences: the targets and the attackers. The attackers felt united even if and when ignored
-
big part of the Breitbart narrative *is* that these ppl have been ignored, by MSM, by society
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
but you're assuming the targets weren't doing the ignoring. I'm suggesting even if they did, acolytes latched on to the bullies
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.