I think many men assume the "Women's March" is supposed to be women-only, which is why it was a bad name for the main anti-Trump march. https://twitter.com/feministabulous/status/819305982866165762 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jonathanchait
.
@jonathanchait you're joking right?? You need a more masculine name for a rally for equal rights?@feministabulous@washingtonpost6 replies 7 retweets 99 likes -
Replying to @j_meaks @jonathanchait
You do realise 'women's' means 'belonging to women'? I assumed it was only for women.
3 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
-
Replying to @j_meaks @jonathanchait
Words have meanings. Of course, ppl will assume The Women's March is for women. Why is this confusing?
2 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @jonathanchait
Yes, it is partly FOR women. FOR women's right, FOR women's safety, etc. But that doesn't mean (1)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
that men can't or shouldn't stand up for those things as well. (2)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @megan_list
Yes, I've been made aware that men are wanted in a supportive capacity now. I didn't realise at first.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Sometimes women want a space for themselves & signify this by calling it a woman's group or event.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.