Indeed and given our emotional need to create rights, we can then think more deeply on how to do it.
-
-
As we've thought further and reasoned better, we expanded rights in various directions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If we limits ourselves again to our gut feelings, rights will regress.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
The problem is you seeing a call to emotional bonds as a claim we should be limited to them.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
When we can usually be fairly sure that ppl have both emotions & ethics.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @IonaItalia
Yes indeed but why confuse the two? Why use emotion in an ethical argument?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @IonaItalia
Because we're human! Emotional & rational animals & it all exists together & feeds into each other.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
There are some discourses where emotion isn't appropriate but Twitter isn't one of them.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @IonaItalia
I'm going to concede all this. I think my point stands but I'm misreading the context.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I think this too. I think essentially, we have the same point.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.