.@jonathanchait you're joking right?? You need a more masculine name for a rally for equal rights? @feministabulous @washingtonpost
-
-
Replying to @j_meaks @jonathanchait
You do realise 'women's' means 'belonging to women'? I assumed it was only for women.
3 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
-
Replying to @j_meaks @jonathanchait
Words have meanings. Of course, ppl will assume The Women's March is for women. Why is this confusing?
2 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @jonathanchait
I was never confused. People who make assumptions WO looking at facts are how we got here in the first place.
5 replies 0 retweets 27 likes -
also I am curious what your issue is with the march in the first place?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @j_meaks
Helen Pluckrose Retweeted Helen Pluckrose
But this also troubled me. Will non-intersectional feminists & non-feminists be welcome?https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/818856115974864896 …
Helen Pluckrose added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
most people I know who are upset about the state of the US and women's rights don't discriminate if someone supports them.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @j_meaks
That woman is an outlier, you think? I suspect you're right and hope she won't put ppl with slightly different views off.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
yea, the attitude about it that I can sense is very open and inclusive. Always going to be obnoxious people but not majority #
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Well, I send my good wishes & support from England.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.