what? This is about grammar?
-
-
Replying to @j_meaks @jonathanchait
Words have meanings. Of course, ppl will assume The Women's March is for women. Why is this confusing?
2 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @jonathanchait
I was never confused. People who make assumptions WO looking at facts are how we got here in the first place.
5 replies 0 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @j_meaks @jonathanchait
Well, the fact is 'Women's March' means 'a march that belongs to women' so people will think it's that.
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
Replying to @j_meaks
Yes, it's my only point here. It's a very simple one but you seem to want to find nefarious motives.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Nope, I see you care about equality so Im curious why you don't question those claiming a name as an excuse to not participate
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @j_meaks
I would question ppl saying 'It says women so I'm not coming even tho I know I can.' That's not what Chait said or I thought.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I think men who absolutely would come if they knew they could are *genuinely* taking the name of the march at face value.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I have read several articles about this march and never once got an indication that men could attend too.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
So I'm suggesting being charitable & reading the low projected male turn-out as confusion rather than indifference.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.