They're both in good faith. Point is whether or not its used to justify restricting anyone or denying opportunities.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @Banned_Ali
My point is that I would use it to justify equal rights. There are better statements that can be made for that.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But I'm not particularly concerned, given that the intentions are good.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @Banned_Ali
Can we agree its OK for an emotional plea, not for public policy?
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Banned_Ali
It's OK for an emotional plea. There are better ones to make though.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen @Banned_Ali
Yes, obviously, they might only be pretending to be emotional coz you can't genuinely decide what to feel.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Banned_Ali
I don't follow but due to typos I haven't been clear myself. I think we agree on all this anyway.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @Banned_Ali
You're thinking logically & strategically even with emotional appeals which are essentially an expression of emotion
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Banned_Ali
I'm being a Vulcan again and I'm expecting everyone else to be one too. Oops!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen
Woman: OMG war! No! My husband, my brother, my sons!. Ben: Actually, all men are equally valuable & their sex is irrelevant
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
But I'm teasing. Yes, ideally, even healthy emotions should be reflected upon & subjected to ethical reasoning b4 used to appeal
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.