.. a true if mostly meaningless statement. Nothing about the statement itself implies subservience.
-
-
Fems see it as implying women can *only* be wives & mothers. You see it as only give women rights if you love them.
-
I see what you mean. I think I have a valid point (but I don't worry about it). I don't think the Fem point holds.
-
"Mothers, wives, daughters..." Every woman is at least one of those. I doesn't imply that's all she is. At all.
-
Fems reading is that way in this context is very uncharitable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.