We can't go on, we must go on, we'll... never mind. Care/Harm is the only one you use though. Goodnight
-
-
Replying to @lpearsemoran
Thanks for telling me. I thought I used a range of them. So does the Moral Foundations test. But I'm sure you're right.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @lpearsemoran
I probably only imagine I consider anything sacred, have strong disgust instincts & strong respect for tradition.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @lpearsemoran
You just keep making v broad, general statements.If there's a good moral argument for banning Morris dancer's make-up.state it
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @lpearsemoran
I'm supposedly motivated by care/harm re defending Morris Men traditions, not ppl who'd ban it cos they think it harms PoC?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Now who's making huge leaps based on assumptions?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lpearsemoran
Was your point not that I'm going only by care/harm & need to consider other foundations including ppl being offended?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
They are offended at a visceral emotional level, not necessarily because it harms PoC. Though they may rationalise it as such
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Why can they not just not wear it themselves & leave others alone? What abt ppl offended at a visceral level by homosexuals?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.