Yes, I'm advocating going with liberal, secular democracy. Do you think we differ somewhere. If so, where?
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I'm pretty sure we're both liberals... but I think tolerance extends to those who would withdraw freedom to wear painted face
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lpearsemoran
Why? You were in favour of conserving old traditions & that one harms no-one.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Because I'm a liberal, I understand need for conservatives, but don't agree that Care/Harm is only criteria for judgement
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lpearsemoran
We've been here. Never have I said that care/harm is the only criteria. We'll leave it here, shall we?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
We can't go on, we must go on, we'll... never mind. Care/Harm is the only one you use though. Goodnight
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lpearsemoran
Thanks for telling me. I thought I used a range of them. So does the Moral Foundations test. But I'm sure you're right.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @lpearsemoran
I probably only imagine I consider anything sacred, have strong disgust instincts & strong respect for tradition.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I think we only truly consider something sacred when we are willing to fight for it. Most of us just get mildly beligerant
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lpearsemoran
Another tangential, broad point.Shld I now declare my willingness to fight for various things?Secularism? Liberalism? England?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And will this bring us any closer to a solid argument for banning the face paint of traditional folk-dancers?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.