No, it doesn't.We can take responsibility for our own feelings &stop trying to legislate protection of them w/out denying them
-
-
I see. So you would impose a moral obligation to cover the ears, yes?
-
What do you mean? That is not the law, is it? Genitals are.
-
That's just an arbitrary social construct attached to sexuality. Could just as easily have been the ears (may have forgotten
) -
Well, sexuality being connected to genitals is not entirely arbitrary! But norms around it are. Just needs to be consistent.
-
I think I've said that I'm not a moral relativist. The same rules and freedoms must apply to all.
-
Very few principles (can't think of any) apply in all contexts
-
That's why they're general and we do the best we can with them.
- 17 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.