That assumes human beings are intellectual information processors Even Spock from Star Trek had his boiling point (his mom I tk)
-
-
Replying to @lpearsemoran
No, it doesn't.We can take responsibility for our own feelings &stop trying to legislate protection of them w/out denying them
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yeah sure, we CAN do it, but it's no where near our default position Once it's something we care about it takes conscious effort
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lpearsemoran @HPluckrose
What we care about is different for libs and cons, and the amount of conscious effort available is a limited resource (Kahneman)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lpearsemoran @HPluckrose
We should take people as they are, not how we would like them to be??
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lpearsemoran
That's exactly what I'm arguing, yes. If you find someone else's clothes offensive, put up with it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I don't think so Helen. I think moral relativity is the road to perdition. If someone turns up at my house wearing a pillowcase
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lpearsemoran @HPluckrose
they can expect to get a bloody nose. However, I also think we should all be entitled to our prejudices
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lpearsemoran
You don't have to invite ppl in pillow cases into your house, no. And yes, prejudices are a right. Imposing on others is not.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Ppl who wear pillowcases don't tend to wait for an invitation Not imposing certain prejudices is the essence of moral relativity
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm not sure what u mean?! Are ppl in pillowcases breaking into houses? If so, its the breaking in rather than the pillowcase!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.