Men are responding to this with variations of "I don't pay for sex." They define "any interaction w/ a woman" as sex/dating, that says a lothttps://twitter.com/BrandonEvrs/status/817082457648283648 …
-
-
Replying to @BrandonEvrs
.
@BrandonEvrs Perhaps they're suggesting women are not prostitutes who will only engage with men for money but full human beings like men?3 replies 6 retweets 30 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
.
@BrandonEvrs Any woman shld be able to decide she'll only engage w/ men for money or own benefit but will then exclude herself from society1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
.
@BrandonEvrs I'd be very surprised if any but a few extremist ideologues did choose to do this & wish ppl wld stop excluding women this way1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
.
@BrandonEvrs Making it abusive for men to disagree with, criticise, explain anything to or have any unpaid interaction w women doesn't help1 reply 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
.
@BrandonEvrs It just excludes women from full engagement with the public sphere. Or it will do, if these ideas get wide public acceptance.2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
This really worries me. I have a daughter. Don't want her to feel victimised if men talk to her, disagree w her or explain anything.
2 replies 3 retweets 12 likes
Its impossible to have any position of responsibility, let alone leadership if you're not equipped to handle criticism or unwanted speech.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Feminists will run into a serious problem if men themselves are allowed the right to freedom of association/contract.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.