That last sentence doesn't make sense if you understand what posttheism is. No-one claims it invented anything.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @MABOOMShow
You're confused abt whether posttheism is good or worthless, whether its new or in existence. Please read the book.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @MABOOMShow
I think your hostility will go if you do coz you've much more common ground than you think.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Helen, I have read much on the subject now and spoken to James, who is not the only author. It offers nothing new or unique.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MABOOMShow
And this contradicts what James said about many atheists already being posttheists how? You're arguing against claims not made.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @MABOOMShow
Well, if James says the approach already exists but advocates more of us take it, why do you keep saying its not new?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
He's saying that's what post-theism is. He's simply taking his favorite tactics already in use and calling those a new name.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MABOOMShow
Pretty much, yes, because those are the positive tactics of a mindset which refuses to take religion on its own terms.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Which is already happening, no new term needed. Again, adding exactly nothing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Just makes it easier to talk abt when u give that positive mindset a name.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.