And yet you also see that many atheists already do it & said that like its a good thing.
And this contradicts what James said about many atheists already being posttheists how? You're arguing against claims not made.
-
-
What? Helen, in never said that.
-
Well, if James says the approach already exists but advocates more of us take it, why do you keep saying its not new?
-
He's saying that's what post-theism is. He's simply taking his favorite tactics already in use and calling those a new name.
-
Pretty much, yes, because those are the positive tactics of a mindset which refuses to take religion on its own terms.
-
Is that bad? Reviewing different atheist approaches to religion & advocating the positive ones as the way forward?
-
In EIWAG, you see the reasoning for arguing these approaches to be best which are based in moral & religious psychology.
-
Is it the name you dislike? If so, what wld you advocate calling a mindset which has moved beyond taking religion on own terms
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Please read the book. I'm out now
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.