If what he said on the podcast wasn't clear to you & it seems it wasn't. Everyone else seems to get it. Go for the long version.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I get what post-theism is. I have no questions about it. I find nothing new or unique in it. I find it therefore worthless.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MABOOMShow
And yet you also see that many atheists already do it & said that like its a good thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
YES! Which makes post-theism worthless and nothing new.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MABOOMShow
They should stop? You think James claimed its newer than the ppl already doing it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
No. I don't. He didn't say that and I didn't say he did. I said post-theism is worthless as it offers nothing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MABOOMShow
Then I suggest you write something explaining why atheists shld stop treating religion as an idea yet to prove itself.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Why would I write that? I agree with and do that. It's just not something invented by post-theism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MABOOMShow
That last sentence doesn't make sense if you understand what posttheism is. No-one claims it invented anything.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Nor did I Helen. I only stated that post-theism is worthless. It recommending nothing new doesn't change that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And that you agree with it & do it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.