James, you were addressing my comments that I wrote regarding what you said on a podcast. I only offered you the chance to defend
If what he said on the podcast wasn't clear to you & it seems it wasn't. Everyone else seems to get it. Go for the long version.
-
-
I get what post-theism is. I have no questions about it. I find nothing new or unique in it. I find it therefore worthless.
-
And yet you also see that many atheists already do it & said that like its a good thing.
-
YES! Which makes post-theism worthless and nothing new.
-
They should stop? You think James claimed its newer than the ppl already doing it?
-
No. I don't. He didn't say that and I didn't say he did. I said post-theism is worthless as it offers nothing.
-
Then I suggest you write something explaining why atheists shld stop treating religion as an idea yet to prove itself.
-
Why would I write that? I agree with and do that. It's just not something invented by post-theism.
-
That last sentence doesn't make sense if you understand what posttheism is. No-one claims it invented anything.
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It was very clear to me. It was also very clearly dishonest, wrong, and/or worthless (depending on the statement). I quoted all.
-
Only to you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.